El VBQ se está utilizando cada vez más para evaluar la densidad ósea; Lin et al querían saber si es importante utilizar resonancia magnética de 1,5 T o 3,0 T. Sorpresa: 1,5 T fue mejor. ¿Ahora que? ¿Volvemos a los imanes más débiles?
Assessment of bone density using the 1.5 T or 3.0 T MRI-based vertebral bone quality score in older patients undergoing spine surgery: does field strength matter? – The Spine Journal (thespinejournalonline.com)
VBQ is getting used more to assess bone density—Lin et al wanted to know if using 1.5T or 3.0T MRI matters. Surprise—1.5T was better. Now what? We go back to weaker magnets? https://t.co/mEmXpTbzmz
— TheSpineJEditor (@TSJ_Editor) January 9, 2024
Lin W, He C, Xie F, Chen T, Zheng G, Yin H, Chen H, Wang Z. Assessment of bone density using the 1.5 T or 3.0 T MRI-based vertebral bone quality score in older patients undergoing spine surgery: does field strength matter? Spine J. 2023 Aug;23(8):1172-1181. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.03.016. Epub 2023 Apr 8. PMID: 37031891.
Copyright
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.
User license
Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial – NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
